Full privacy evaluation | See all
Thumbnail
Updated January 10, 2018

Accelify

  • Privacy policies are not available.
  • Site uses encryption.
  • Site forces the use of encryption.
The criteria for "Not Recommended For Use" measure whether or not a vendor has done the bare minimum to allow people to have even a rudimentary understanding about how the vendor protects user privacy. The four criteria here are all basics of sound privacy and security practice. Vendors who do not meet these basic requirements can potentially run afoul of state and federal privacy laws.

As with the "Use with Caution" criteria, a "Not Recommended" designation is NOT a sign that a vendor is necessarily doing anything unethical or illegal. It is a sign that, based on publicly available policies and observable security practices, their systems do not provide adequate guarantees that information stored in their systems will be protected.
Not Recommended
0
Overall Scoreinfo-bubble

This overall score represents how the service addressed all our evaluation questions. A higher score (up to 100) means the service provides more transparent and comprehensive policies.

Overview

Accelify provides a suite of tools designed to support schools and districts get resources to students with learning differences. However, Accelify does not make their privacy policies, terms of service, or any additional data use agreements available from any obvious or easily discoverable link on their web site. Accelify does include a "Privacy Statement" that defines some general principles. The "Privacy Statement" also specifies that additional Terms of Use agreements are available within purchased systems. However, without being able to access and review these privacy and security statements, we are not able to provide a full evaluation of this service. Schools, districts, or other Education Agencies are strongly encouraged to review these terms before purchasing and using these systems.

Accelify can be accessed through its website. The Privacy Policy used for this evaluation can be found on Accelify’s website. This evaluation only considers policies that have been made publicly available prior to an individual using the application or service.

SafetyPromoting responsible use
arrow
Evaluating safety takes into consideration best practices that protect a user's physical and emotional health. A higher score (up to 100) means the service provides more transparent and comprehensive responses related to safety.
0

As noted in our full summary, because Accelify only makes a brief Privacy Statement publicly available, Accelify is not recommended for use at this time.

PrivacyProtecting collected information
arrow
Evaluating privacy takes into consideration best practices that protect the disclosure of a user's personal information. A higher score (up to 100) means the service provides more transparent and comprehensive responses related to privacy.
0

As noted in our full summary, because Accelify only makes a brief Privacy Statement publicly available, Accelify is not recommended for use at this time.

SecurityProtecting against unauthorized access
arrow
Evaluating security takes into consideration best practices that protect the integrity and confidentiality of a user's data. A higher score (up to 100) means the service provides more transparent and comprehensive responses related to security.
0

As noted in our full summary, because Accelify only makes a brief Privacy Statement publicly available, Accelify is not recommended for use at this time.

ComplianceFollowing statutory laws and regulations
arrow
Evaluating compliance takes into consideration best practices of companies that collect personal information from children or students and the legal obligations for the privacy and security of that information. A higher score (up to 100) means the service provides more transparent and comprehensive responses related to compliance.
0

As noted in our full summary, because Accelify only makes a brief Privacy Statement publicly available, Accelify is not recommended for use at this time.

About Privacy Evaluations

The privacy evaluations have been designed with the help and support of a consortium of schools and districts across the United States. These evaluations are designed to streamline making an informed decision about the potential privacy implications of educational technology used to support teaching and learning.

Our core evaluation criteria are freely available and will remain freely available. People are encouraged to read the questions we use and the information security primer we released. Vendors are encouraged to use our questions and the information security primer to self-evaluate. You can also learn more about our evaluation process.

Please be in touch with any questions or feedback.